This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:38963/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Justice Commentaries
Vol. 78, Issue 3, 2015August 03, 2015 EDT

ME AND MR. JONES: A SYSTEMS-BASED ANALYSIS OF A CATASTROPHIC DEFENSE OUTCOME

Pamela R. Metzger,
public defender practice data collectionillegal incarcerationKatrina-Gideon Interview ProjectKatrina Prisonersarrest-to-appearance delay

Articles in Vol. 78, Issue 3, 2015

Vol. 78, Issue 3, 2015
  • DEATH, BUT IS IT MURDER? THE ROLE OF STEREOTYPES AND CULTURAL PERCEPTIONS IN THE WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS OF WOMEN
    Andrea L. LewisSara L. Sommervold
  • THE POTENTIAL IMPACTOF RAPE CULTURE ON JUROR DECISION MAKING: IMPLICATIONS FOR WRONGFUL ACQUITTALS IN SEXUAL ASSAULT TRIALS
    Meagen M. HildebrandCynthia J. Najdowski
  • GENDER ROLE INCONGRUENCE AND THE ADJUDICATION OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
    Bonita M. Veysey
  • CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM INVOLVEMENT AND GENDER STEREOTYPES: CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR WOMEN’S IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT CRIMINAL IDENTITIES
    Luis M. RiveraBonita M. Veysey
  • “I DON’T LIKE GAYS, OKAY?” USE OF THE “GAY PANIC” MURDER DEFENSE IN MODERN AMERICAN COURTROOMS: THE ULTIMATE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
    Joseph R. Williams
  • FOREWORD
    Jonathan Lippman
  • HOW DO WE “DO DATA” IN PUBLIC DEFENSE?
    Andrew Lucas Blaize Davies
  • THE ABA “TEN PRINCIPLES OF A PUBLIC DEFENSE DELIVERY SYSTEM”: HOW CLOSE ARE WE TO BEING ABLE TO PUT THEM INTO PRACTICE?
    Caroline S. Cooper
  • THE MEASURE OF GOOD LAWYERING: EVALUATING HOLISTIC DEFENSE IN PRACTICE
    Cynthia G. LeeBrian J. OstromMatthew Kleiman
  • THE TRIALS OF INDIGENT DEFENSE: TYPE OF COUNSEL AND CASE OUTCOMES IN FELONY JURY TRIALS
    Erin York Cornwell
  • ME AND MR. JONES: A SYSTEMS-BASED ANALYSIS OF A CATASTROPHIC DEFENSE OUTCOME
    Pamela R. Metzger
  • MAKE THEM HEAR YOU: PARTICIPATORY DEFENSE AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM
    Janet MooreMarla SandysRaj Jayadev
  • WHAT IS THE STATE OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON INDIGENT DEFENSE NATIONWIDE? A BRIEF OVERVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
    Nadine FrederiquePatricia JosephR. Christopher C. Hild
  • DEDICATION TO DEAN ALICIA OUELLETTE
    Howard A. Levine
  • DEAN ALICIA OUELLETTE: SCHOLAR, MENTOR, LEADER
    Rosemary Queenan
  • FOREWORD
    Alissa Pollitz Worden
  • “DON’T TALK TO ME ABOUT DECEPTION”: THE NECESSARY EROSION OF THE TRANS* PANIC DEFENSE
    Aimee WoddaVanessa R. Panfil
  • GENDERING AND RACING WRONGFUL CONVICTION: INTERSECTIONALITY, “NORMAL CRIMES,” AND WOMEN’S EXPERIENCES OF MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
    Elizabeth WebsterJody Miller
  • DEATH, BUT IS IT MURDER? THE ROLE OF STEREOTYPES AND CULTURAL PERCEPTIONS IN THE WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS OF WOMEN
    Andrea L. LewisSara L. Sommervold
  • THE POTENTIAL IMPACTOF RAPE CULTURE ON JUROR DECISION MAKING: IMPLICATIONS FOR WRONGFUL ACQUITTALS IN SEXUAL ASSAULT TRIALS
    Meagen M. HildebrandCynthia J. Najdowski
  • GENDER ROLE INCONGRUENCE AND THE ADJUDICATION OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
    Bonita M. Veysey
  • CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM INVOLVEMENT AND GENDER STEREOTYPES: CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR WOMEN’S IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT CRIMINAL IDENTITIES
    Luis M. RiveraBonita M. Veysey
  • “I DON’T LIKE GAYS, OKAY?” USE OF THE “GAY PANIC” MURDER DEFENSE IN MODERN AMERICAN COURTROOMS: THE ULTIMATE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
    Joseph R. Williams
  • FOREWORD
    Jonathan Lippman
  • HOW DO WE “DO DATA” IN PUBLIC DEFENSE?
    Andrew Lucas Blaize Davies
  • THE ABA “TEN PRINCIPLES OF A PUBLIC DEFENSE DELIVERY SYSTEM”: HOW CLOSE ARE WE TO BEING ABLE TO PUT THEM INTO PRACTICE?
    Caroline S. Cooper
  • THE MEASURE OF GOOD LAWYERING: EVALUATING HOLISTIC DEFENSE IN PRACTICE
    Cynthia G. LeeBrian J. OstromMatthew Kleiman
  • THE TRIALS OF INDIGENT DEFENSE: TYPE OF COUNSEL AND CASE OUTCOMES IN FELONY JURY TRIALS
    Erin York Cornwell
  • ME AND MR. JONES: A SYSTEMS-BASED ANALYSIS OF A CATASTROPHIC DEFENSE OUTCOME
    Pamela R. Metzger
  • MAKE THEM HEAR YOU: PARTICIPATORY DEFENSE AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM
    Janet MooreMarla SandysRaj Jayadev
  • WHAT IS THE STATE OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON INDIGENT DEFENSE NATIONWIDE? A BRIEF OVERVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
    Nadine FrederiquePatricia JosephR. Christopher C. Hild
  • DEDICATION TO DEAN ALICIA OUELLETTE
    Howard A. Levine
  • DEAN ALICIA OUELLETTE: SCHOLAR, MENTOR, LEADER
    Rosemary Queenan
  • FOREWORD
    Alissa Pollitz Worden
  • “DON’T TALK TO ME ABOUT DECEPTION”: THE NECESSARY EROSION OF THE TRANS* PANIC DEFENSE
    Aimee WoddaVanessa R. Panfil
  • GENDERING AND RACING WRONGFUL CONVICTION: INTERSECTIONALITY, “NORMAL CRIMES,” AND WOMEN’S EXPERIENCES OF MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
    Elizabeth WebsterJody Miller
Albany Law Review
Pamela R. Metzger, ME AND MR. JONES: A SYSTEMS-BASED ANALYSIS OF A CATASTROPHIC DEFENSE OUTCOME, 78 Albany Law Review (2015).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system