This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:38963/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
General
Vol. 76, Issue 1, 2013January 01, 2013 EDT

MISSING THE TARGET: WHERE THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS FALL SHORT IN THE CONTEXT OF TARGETED KILLING

Michelle Mallette-Piasecki,
Geneva Conventionsinternational lawarmed conflictsInternational Humanitarian Lawtargeted killingpreemptive self-defenseUnited NationsUN Chartercombating terrorism

Articles in Vol. 76, Issue 1, 2013

Vol. 76, Issue 1, 2013
  • THE BUTT STOPS HERE: THE TOBACCO CONTROL ACT‘S ANTI-SMOKING REGULATIONS RUN AFOUL OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT
    Danielle WeatherbyTerri R. Day
  • HIGH VOLUME HYDRAULIC FRACTURING AND HOME RULE: THE STRUGGLE FOR CONTROL
    Gregory R. NearpassRobert J. Brenner
  • ARE FRANCHISEES WELL-INFORMED? REVISITING THE DEBATE OVER FRANCHISE RELATIONSHIP LAWS
    Robert W. EmersonUri Benoliel
  • THE OPINIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL: HOW AND WHY THEY ARE SIGNIFICANT
    Arthur H. Garrison
  • BOOK REVIEW: BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL LITIGATION IN FEDERAL COURTS, THIRD EDITION (ROBERT L. HAIG, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF)
    Randolph F. Treece
  • MISSING THE TARGET: WHERE THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS FALL SHORT IN THE CONTEXT OF TARGETED KILLING
    Michelle Mallette-Piasecki
  • AN INSIDER‘S PERSPECTIVE: DEFENSE OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY‘S MARKETING PRACTICES
    Kanika Johar
  • DEAN PENELOPE ANDREWS: ADVOCACY, LEADERSHIP, VISION
    Erika HauserKanika Johar
  • CATHOLIC VALUES, HUMAN DIGNITY, AND THE MORAL LAW IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: JUSTICE ANTHONY KENNEDY‘S APPROACH TO THE CONSTITUTION
    Anne Jelliff
  • NEW YORK STATE‘S 2007 WORKERS‘COMPENSATION REFORM: SUCCESS OR FAILURE?
    Mary L. D'Agostino
  • EXCEPTIONAL FREEDOM—THE ROBERTS COURT, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE NEW ABSOLUTISM
    Ronald K.L. Collins
  • HATE SPEECH, FIGHTING WORDS, AND BEYOND—WHY AMERICAN LAW IS UNIQUE
    Robert M. O'Neil
  • CATEGORIES, TIERS OF REVIEW, AND THE ROILING SEA OF FREE SPEECH DOCTRINEAND PRINCIPLE: A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF UNITED STATES V. ALVAREZ
    Rodney A. Smolla
  • ENCOURAGING CONGRESS TO ENCOURAGE SPEECH: REFLECTIONS ON UNITED STATES V. ALVAREZ
    Jeffery C. Barnum
  • THE SUPREME COURT AND POLITICAL SPEECH IN THE 21ST CENTURY: THE IMPLICATIONS OF HOLDER V. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT
    Marjorie Heins
  • ARE THERE FIRST AMENDMENT VACUUMS?: THE CASE OF THE FREE SPEECH CHALLENGE TO TOBACCO PACKAGE LABELING REQUIREMENTS
    R. George Wright
  • PUNTING IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT‘S RED ZONE: THE SUPREME COURT‘S INDECISION ON THE FCC‘S INDECENCY REGULATIONS LEAVES BROADCASTERS STILL SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS
    Robert D. RichardsDavid J. Weinert
  • MEDIA DIVERSITY AND ONLINE ADVERTISING
    Marvin AmmoriLuke Pelican
  • CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AS FREE EXPRESSION
    Martin H. RedishMichael J.T. Downey
  • THE DEMOCRATIC MISSION OF THE UNIVERSITY
    Owen Fiss
  • WHAT ARE WE SAYING? VIOLENCE, VULGARITY, LIES . . . AND THE IMPORTANCE OF 21ST CENTURY FREE SPEECH
    Benjamin P. Pomerance
  • DEBATE ON CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
    Floyd AbramsAlan B. MorrisonRonald K.L. Collins
  • PANEL DISCUSSIONON RECENT U.S. SUPREME COURT FREE SPEECH DECISIONS & THE IMPLICATIONS OF THESE CASES FOR AMERICAN SOCIETY
    Alan B. MorrisonSusan N. HermanRobert M. O'NeilRonald K.L. CollinsRobert D. RichardsAdam Liptak
  • HEALTH REFORM AND THE SUPREME COURT: THE ACA SURVIVES THE BATTLE OF THE BROCCOLI AND FORTIFIES ITSELF AGAINST FUTURE FATAL ATTACK
    Alicia Ouellette
  • POWER OF APPOINTMENT LEGISLATION IN NEW YORK: IT‘S TIME FOR MODERNIZATION
    Ira Mark Bloom
Albany Law Review
Michelle Mallette-Piasecki, MISSING THE TARGET: WHERE THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS FALL SHORT IN THE CONTEXT OF TARGETED KILLING, 76 Albany Law Review (2013).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system