This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:4849/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
General
Vol. 79, Issue 2, 2016June 15, 2016 EDT

RUIZ-DIAZ V. UNITED STATES: RFRA, SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN, AND THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S CAUSATION-NEXUS REQUIREMENT—A WRINKLE OR A ROADBLOCK FOR FUTURE IMMIGRATION-RELATED RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CHALLENGES?

Scott D. Pollock,
Ruiz-Diaz v. United StatesReligious Freedom Restoration ActRFRAUnited States Citizenship and Immigration Servicesreligious workerspermanent resident statusreligious-based exceptionsFree Exercise ClauseFirst Amendment

Articles in Vol. 79, Issue 2, 2016

Vol. 79, Issue 2, 2016
  • THE PATH TO EXONERATION
    Jon B. GouldRichard A. Leo
  • IDENTITY AND NARRATIVE: TURNING OPPRESSION INTO CLIENT EMPOWERMENT IN SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CASES
    JoNel Newman
  • AN ELASTIC AMENDMENT: JUSTICE STEPHEN G. BREYER’S FLUID CONCEPTIONS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH
    Benjamin Pomerance
  • WILLFULNESS
    David Welkowitz
  • MATCHING THE TRAJECTORY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY DEFENSE: A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE STATES
    Noah Cyr Engelhart
  • WHAT “YES MEANS YES” MEANS FOR NEW YORK SCHOOLS: THE POSITIVE EFFECTS OF NEW YORK’S EFFORTS TO COMBAT CAMPUS SEXUAL ASSAULT THROUGH AFFIRMATIVE CONSENT
    Chandler Delamater
  • Foreword: MY RELIGION, MY RULES: EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF RFRA LAWS ON INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
    Bryan A. Hum
  • WHEN ONE’S RIGHT TO MARRY MAKES OTHERS “UNMERRY”
    Shai Stern
  • RUIZ-DIAZ V. UNITED STATES: RFRA, SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN, AND THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S CAUSATION-NEXUS REQUIREMENT—A WRINKLE OR A ROADBLOCK FOR FUTURE IMMIGRATION-RELATED RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CHALLENGES?
    Scott D. Pollock
  • OPTING OUT IN THE NAME OF GOD: WILL LAWYERS BE COMPELLED TO HANDLE SAME-SEX DIVORCES?
    Bill Piatt
Albany Law Review
Scott D. Pollock, RUIZ-DIAZ V. UNITED STATES: RFRA, SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN, AND THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S CAUSATION-NEXUS REQUIREMENT—A WRINKLE OR A ROADBLOCK FOR FUTURE IMMIGRATION-RELATED RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CHALLENGES?, 79 Albany Law Review (2016).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system