P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 79, Issue 2, 2016June 15, 2016 EDT
MATCHING THE TRAJECTORY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY DEFENSE: A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE STATES
MATCHING THE TRAJECTORY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY DEFENSE: A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE STATES
Noah Cyr Engelhart,
Bill of RightsHall v. Floridaintellectual disability defenseEighth Amendmentcruel and unusual punishmentcapital punishmenthuman dignity
Articles in Vol. 79, Issue 2, 2016
Vol. 79, Issue 2, 2016
- THE PATH TO EXONERATIONJon B. GouldRichard A. Leo
- IDENTITY AND NARRATIVE: TURNING OPPRESSION INTO CLIENT EMPOWERMENT IN SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CASESJoNel Newman
- AN ELASTIC AMENDMENT: JUSTICE STEPHEN G. BREYER’S FLUID CONCEPTIONS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECHBenjamin Pomerance
- WILLFULNESSDavid Welkowitz
- MATCHING THE TRAJECTORY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY DEFENSE: A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE STATESNoah Cyr Engelhart
- WHAT “YES MEANS YES” MEANS FOR NEW YORK SCHOOLS: THE POSITIVE EFFECTS OF NEW YORK’S EFFORTS TO COMBAT CAMPUS SEXUAL ASSAULT THROUGH AFFIRMATIVE CONSENTChandler Delamater
- Foreword: MY RELIGION, MY RULES: EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF RFRA LAWS ON INDIVIDUAL RIGHTSBryan A. Hum
- WHEN ONE’S RIGHT TO MARRY MAKES OTHERS “UNMERRY”Shai Stern
- RUIZ-DIAZ V. UNITED STATES: RFRA, SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN, AND THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S CAUSATION-NEXUS REQUIREMENT—A WRINKLE OR A ROADBLOCK FOR FUTURE IMMIGRATION-RELATED RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CHALLENGES?Scott D. Pollock
- OPTING OUT IN THE NAME OF GOD: WILL LAWYERS BE COMPELLED TO HANDLE SAME-SEX DIVORCES?Bill Piatt
Noah Cyr Engelhart, MATCHING THE TRAJECTORY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY DEFENSE: A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE STATES, 79 Albany Law Review (2016).