Justice Commentaries
%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
This Article examines the proliferation of spyware and discusses the contributory infringement doctrine as a means to impose indirect liability on spyware developers for privacy violations facilitated by their spyware.
%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
This Article critiques the “College Free Speech Rankings,” published by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, in the context of widespread pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses.
%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
This Note discusses the rise of drag bans and ways that the legal system is misused to marginalize members of the LGBTQIA+ community.
%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
This student Comment reviews the historical treatment of people with disabilities, the current IEP process that disadvantages parents/guardians, and proposes an amendment to the IDEA ensuring legal representation for parents/guardians.
This Essay explores how the law identifies climate-displaced people and states’ obligations to protect them, aruging that guaranteeing substantial support for the Loss and Damage Fund is the first step.
This Article offers a working definition of the "humanitarian stowaway," and provides recommendations for the American government to modernize enforcement and practice of immigration laws to protect the humanitarian stowaway.
%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
By linking court and sentencing data from the Federal Justice Statistics Program, this Article examines the influence of the type of counsel in federal criminal cases.
%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
The primary question this Albany Law School student note addresses is whether LGBTQ individuals targeted in social media by bad-faith accusations of grooming may seek recourse under defamation law.
%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
This Note delves into the legality, discriminatory use, and fabricated public health rationale of the Title 42 expulsion policy.
%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
This article is the first to examine rearrest before an adult non-citizen has been ordered removed or potentially even found to be removable.
This article suggests a new way to view the injury to the crime victim in a discriminatory decision not to prosecute, and a new way to redress that injury.
This Article argues that the two limiting principles that justify use of force—necessity and reasonableness—should equally apply to justify criminalization