P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 77, Issue 4, 2015January 05, 2015 EDT
“OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR PRECEDENTS, AND [OUR] OWN BEST HUMAN JUDGMENTS:” A SURVEY OF FREE EXERCISE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN THE WAKE OF OREGON V. SMITH.
“OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR PRECEDENTS, AND [OUR] OWN BEST HUMAN JUDGMENTS:” A SURVEY OF FREE EXERCISE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN THE WAKE OF OREGON V. SMITH.
Robert McIver,
free exercise of religionOregon v. SmithNew FederalismNew York State Constitutionfederalist systemreligious libertiesstate constitutional protectionsFirst Amendment
Articles in Vol. 77, Issue 4, 2015
Vol. 77, Issue 4, 2015
- EDITOR’S FOREWORDVincent Martin Bonventre
- DEDICATIONRobert McIver
- CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCEH. COOKE EIGHTH ANNUAL STATE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMENTARY SYMPOSIUM: EXCEEDING FEDERAL STANDARDSAlbany Law Review
- JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: IS IT PRESERVED OR IMPAIRED BY THE ELECTION OF JUDGES?Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick
- NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—TODAY UNQUESTIONABLY ACCEPTED AND APPLIED AS A VITAL AND ESSENTIAL PART OF NEW YORK JURISPRUDENCEStewart F. Hancock Jr.
- DO PRECEDENTS TAKE PRECEDENCE? STARE DECISISAND OREGON CONSTITUTIONALISMJack L. Landau
- REALIGNING THE CONSTITUTIONAL PENDULUMMyron T. SteelePeter I. Tsoflias
- CONSTITUTIONAL “STUFF”: HOUSE CLEANING THE NEW YORK CONSTITUTION—PART IPeter J. GalieChristopher Bopst
- AVOIDING THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY: MISSOURI AND KANSAS SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CAPS ON NONECONOMIC DAMAGES DEMONSTRATE THE NEED FOR OBJECTIVE PROCEDURES IN THE SELECTION OF SPECIAL JUDGESStephen R. Clark
- BALANCING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT ON THE SCALES OF JUSTICE: IS THE LAWYER OR THE CLIENT IN CONTROL OF THE PROCEEDINGS?Caroline Johnson Levine
- STOPS, FRISKS, AND POLICE ENCOUNTERS: THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS’S STRICT APPLICATION OF THE DE BOUR STANDARDAndrea A. Long
- CRITIQUE OF MONEY JUDGMENT PART THREE: RESTRAINING NOTICESDavid Gray Carlson
- “OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR PRECEDENTS, AND [OUR] OWN BEST HUMAN JUDGMENTS:” A SURVEY OF FREE EXERCISE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN THE WAKE OF OREGON V. SMITH.Robert McIver
Robert McIver, “OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR PRECEDENTS, AND [OUR] OWN BEST HUMAN JUDGMENTS:” A SURVEY OF FREE EXERCISE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN THE WAKE OF OREGON V. SMITH., 77 Albany Law Review (2015).