This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:55303/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Justice Commentaries
Vol. 79, Issue 3, 2016December 17, 2016 EDT

IF HINDSIGHT IS 20/20, OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM SHOULD NOT BE BLIND TO NEW EVIDENCE OF INNOCENCE: A SURVEY OF POST-CONVICTION NEW EVIDENCE STATUTES AND A PROPOSED MODEL

Justin Brooks, Alexander Simpson, Paige Kaneb,
new evidence standardpost-convictionevidence of innocenceburden of proofreversing convictionnew evidence statutesBrady materialactual innocence
Albany Law Review
Justin Brooks, Alexander Simpson & Paige Kaneb, IF HINDSIGHT IS 20/20, OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM SHOULD NOT BE BLIND TO NEW EVIDENCE OF INNOCENCE: A SURVEY OF POST-CONVICTION NEW EVIDENCE STATUTES AND A PROPOSED MODEL, 79 Albany Law Review (2016).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system