THAT’S (NOT) WHAT SHE SAID: THE CASE FOR EXPANDING ADMISSION OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS IN NEW YORK CRIMINAL TRIALS | Published in Albany Law Review

Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

Metrics
THAT’S (NOT) WHAT SHE SAID: THE CASE FOR EXPANDING ADMISSION OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS IN NEW YORK CRIMINAL TRIALS

Steven V. DeBraccio,

prior inconsistent statementshearsay evidenceunfair prejudicelimiting instructionseyewitness testimonydefendants’ rightsfact findingout-of-court statement

Pageviews and PDF downloads

Pageviews Downloads

0 past 30 days

Last 7 days Last 30 days Last 90 days All time

No results for selected time period