This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:38963/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
State Constitutional Commentary
Vol. 74, Issue 4, 2011November 11, 2011 EDT

LITIGATING DIGNITY: A HUMAN RIGHTS FRAMEWORK

Johanna Kalb,
Universal Declaration of Human Rightshuman dignityright to dignityinternational human rights lawsubstantive rights

Articles in Vol. 74, Issue 4, 2011

Vol. 74, Issue 4, 2011
  • EDITOR'S FOREWORD
    Vincent Martin Bonventre
  • CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE H. COOKE FIFTH ANNUAL STATE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMENTARY SYMPOSIUM GREAT WOMEN, GREAT CHIEFS OPENING REMARKS
    Caitlain Devereaux LewisJessie R. Cardinale
  • MODERATOR’S INTRODUCTION
    Vincent Martin Bonventre
  • INTRODUCTION TO CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHA TERNUS
    Donna Young
  • REMARKS: Chief Justice Marsha Ternus of Iowa
    Marsha Ternus
  • INTRODUCTION TO CHIEF JUSTICE JEAN H. TOAL
    Rosemary Queenan
  • REMARKS: Chief Justice Jean H. Toal of South Carolina
    Jean H. Toal
  • INTRODUCTION TO CHIEF JUSTICE MARGARET H. MARSHALL
    Mary Lynch
  • REMARKS: Former Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall of Massachusetts
    Margaret H. Marshall
  • QUESTIONS &ANSWERS
    Albany Law Review
  • EXECUTIVE ORDERS ANDGUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY TO REORGANIZE STATE GOVERNMENT
    Gerald BenjaminZachary Keck
  • CONTEMPORARY ASSERTIONS OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY AND THE SAFEGUARDS OF AMERICAN FEDERALISM
    John Dinan
  • THE ONCE AND FUTURE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: ON THE LAW OF AMERICAN STATE CONSTITUTIONS
    Lawrence Friedman
  • STATE CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION-MAKING AND PRINCIPLES OF EQUALITY: REVISITING BAKER V. STATE AND THE QUESTION OF GENDER IN THE MARRIAGE EQUALITY DEBATE
    Cheryl Hanna
  • SHADY GROVE: DUCK-RABBITS, CLEAR STATEMENTS, AND FEDERALISM
    Helen Hershkoff
  • LITIGATING DIGNITY: A HUMAN RIGHTS FRAMEWORK
    Johanna Kalb
  • STATE CONSTITUTIONS AS INTERACTIVE EXPRESSIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL VALUES
    Justin R. Long
  • RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN STATE HABEAS PROCEEDINGS
    Jason Mazzone
  • THE CONSTITUTIONAL PARAMETERS OF NEW YORK STATE‘S DOMESTIC WORKERS BILL OF RIGHTS: BALANCING THE RIGHTS OF WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS
    Donna E. Young
  • CHIEF JUSTICE MARGARET MARSHALL: A LIFETIME DEVOTED TO DEFENDING LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL
    Jessie R. Cardinale
  • CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHA TERNUS: AN INSIDE LOOK AT THE TENURE OF IOWA’S FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE
    Jessie R. Cardinale
  • CHIEF JUSTICE JEAN HOEFER TOAL OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT: VOTING PATTERNSIN DIVIDEDCRIMINAL CASES
    Nisa Khan
  • ESTABLISHING AND REBUTTING MATERNITY: WHY WOMEN ARE AT A LOSS DESPITE THE ADVENT OF GENETIC TESTING
    Amanda E. De Vito
Albany Law Review
Johanna Kalb, LITIGATING DIGNITY: A HUMAN RIGHTS FRAMEWORK, 74 Albany Law Review (2011).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system