P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 82, Issue 4, 2019September 13, 2019 EDT
RESULTS FROM THE LABORATORIES OF DEMOCRACY: EVALUATING THE SUBSTANTIVE OPEN COURTS CLAUSE AS FOUND IN STATE CONSTITUTIONS
RESULTS FROM THE LABORATORIES OF DEMOCRACY: EVALUATING THE SUBSTANTIVE OPEN COURTS CLAUSE AS FOUND IN STATE CONSTITUTIONS
Patrick John McGinley,
Substantice Open Court ClauseDemocracyState Constitutional CommentaryDue ProcessWorkers’ Compensation Law
Articles in Vol. 82, Issue 4, 2019
Vol. 82, Issue 4, 2019
- EDITOR’S FOREWORDVincent Martin Bonventre
- THE APPELLATE DIVISION’S ADJUDICATION OF CHALLENGES TO POLITICAL PARTY NOMINATIONS IN 2018, AND ITS MEANING FOR BALLOT ACCESS IN NEW YORKCraig R. Bucki
- SEA CHANGE: NEW YORK STATE CLASS ACTIONS: MAKING IT WORK, FULFILLING THE PROMISE: PART IIIThomas A. Dickerson
- WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS STAYS IN VEGAS: ASSERTING A TORT CLAIM IN NEW YORK COURTS AGAINST A FOREIGN CORPORATION ARISING FROM A NEW YORKER’S OUT-OF-STATE ACCIDENT POST-DAIMLERMichael J. HutterMark L. Powers
- HOME SWEET HOME: HOW NEW YORK COURTS HAVE DEALT WITH DAIMLER’S “AT HOME” REQUIREMENT FOR GENERAL JURISDICTIONBurton N. Lipshie
- IMPEDIMENTS TO “ALBERT PUJOLS STATUS”: SOME DANGER ZONES AND SAFETY NETS IN NEW YORK APPELLATE PRACTICEEdward J. Markarian
- GLOBAL REBRINGS THE LAW IN LINE WITH REINSURANCE INDUSTRY PRACTICEThomas R. Newman
- CHOICE OF WHAT? THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS DEFINES THE PARAMETERS OF CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSES IN MULTIJURISDICTIONAL CASESPatricia Youngblood Reyhan
- PEOPLE V. MORRISON: SOME ANXIOUS OBSERVATIONS ON THE COURT OF APPEALS’ O’RAMA JURISPRUDENCEPaul Shechtman
- LET’S BE REASONABLE: WHY NEW YORK COURTS NEED TO EMBRACE THE FEDERAL STANDARD FOR ANALYZING POLICE-CIVILIAN ENCOUNTERSYuval Simchi-Levi
- HOW STATE COURTS CAN HELP AMERICA RECOVER THE RULE OF LAW: THE PENNSYLVANIA EXPERIENCEBruce Ledewitz
- A CONSTELLATION OF CONSTITUTIONS: DISCOVERING & EMBRACING STATE CONSTITUTIONS AS GUARDIANS OF CIVIL LIBERTIESLoretta H. RushMarie Forney Miller
- MOVING FROM THE STATEHOUSES TO THE STATE COURTS? THE POST-RFRA FUTURE OF STATE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM PROTECTIONSPaul BaumgardnerBrian K. Miller
- STATE COURTS, IMMIGRATION, AND POLITICS IN THE TRUMP ERACynthia Boyer
- RESULTS FROM THE LABORATORIES OF DEMOCRACY: EVALUATING THE SUBSTANTIVE OPEN COURTS CLAUSE AS FOUND IN STATE CONSTITUTIONSPatrick John McGinley
- EVALUATING JUDICIAL STANDARDS OF CONDUCT IN THE CURRENT POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CLIMATE: THE NEED TO STRENGTHEN IMPROPRIETY STANDARDS AND REMOVAL REMEDIES TO INCLUDE PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND COMMUNITY HARMJoshua E. Kastenberg
- JUDGES BEHAVING BADLY . . . CLINICS FIGHTING BACK: THE STRUGGLE FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILES IN STATE DEPENDENCY COURTS IN THE AGE OF TRUMPBernard P. Perlmutter
- THE SINGLE-SUBJECT RULE: A STATE CONSTITUTIONAL DILEMMARichard Briffault
- DISSENTS OF THE BERCH COURT: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF UNANIMITY IN A STATE SUPREME COURTKevin M. Morrow
Patrick John McGinley, RESULTS FROM THE LABORATORIES OF DEMOCRACY: EVALUATING THE SUBSTANTIVE OPEN COURTS CLAUSE AS FOUND IN STATE CONSTITUTIONS, 82 Albany Law Review (2019).