P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 81, Issue 3, 2018July 17, 2018 EDT
EXAMINING THE ROLE OF SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM: ADMISSIBILITY AND RELIABILITY OF FORENSIC SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM
EXAMINING THE ROLE OF SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM: ADMISSIBILITY AND RELIABILITY OF FORENSIC SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM
Maryam Hamirani, Itiel E. Dror, Ruth M. Morgan,
human cognitionforensic sciencehuman decision-makingadmissibilityreliabilitycognitive biasNational Academy of Sciences
Articles in Vol. 81, Issue 3, 2018
Vol. 81, Issue 3, 2018
- SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME: AS A CONTROVERSY IN WRONGFUL CONVICTION CASESEza Bella Zakirova
- THE SKY POLICE: DRONES AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENTJessica Dwyer-Moss
- JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR AND THE SENSE OF RESPECTAndrew B. Ayers
- A CONVERSATION WITH JUSTICE SONIA SOTOMAYORAlbany Law Review
- SNAKE OIL WITH A BITE: THE LETHAL VENEER OF SCIENCE AND TEXAS’S DEATH PENALTYJames R. Acker
- FINGERPRINTS AND MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE: “OTHER” TYPES OF ERROR AND A POST-CONVICTION RIGHT TO DATABASE SEARCHINGSimon A. ColeBarry C. Scheck
- THE LATENT PRINT EXAMINATION PROCESS MAPSimon A. ColeBarry C. Scheck
- THE BEST INSURANCE AGAINST MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE CAUSED BY JUNK SCIENCE: AN ADMISSIBILITY TEST THAT IS SCIENTIFICALLY AND LEGALLY SOUNDEdward J. Imwinkelried
- FORENSIC EVIDENCE INWRONGFUL CONVICTIONCASES: FROM BEING A RIGHT-HAND MAN TO BECOMING A SNAKE IN THE GRASSIrina Zakirova
- IT’S NOT A MATCH: WHY THE LAW CAN’T LET GO OF JUNK SCIENCEAliza B. KaplanJanis C. Puracal
- PICKING AND CHOOSING: INCONSISTENT USE OF NEUROSCIENTIFIC LEGAL EVIDENCEJoseph J. Avery
- EXAMINING THE ROLE OF SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM: ADMISSIBILITY AND RELIABILITY OF FORENSIC SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOMMaryam HamiraniItiel E. DrorRuth M. Morgan
- NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL COMPETENCY: CURRENT USES AND FUTURE POTENTIALJohn B. Meixner Jr.
Maryam Hamirani, Itiel E. Dror & Ruth M. Morgan, EXAMINING THE ROLE OF SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM: ADMISSIBILITY AND RELIABILITY OF FORENSIC SCIENCE IN THE COURTROOM, 81 Albany Law Review (2018).