P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 75, Issue 2, 2012March 03, 2012 EDT
SHOULD WE BE TALKING? BEGINNING A DIALOGUE ON GUARDIANSHIP FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED IN NEW YORK
SHOULD WE BE TALKING? BEGINNING A DIALOGUE ON GUARDIANSHIP FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED IN NEW YORK
Rose Mary Bailly, Charis B. Nick-Torok,
Mental Hygiene Lawguardianshipincapacitated personSurrogate‘s Court Procedure Actintellectual disabilitySCPA 17-Anational guardianship reform
Articles in Vol. 75, Issue 2, 2012
Vol. 75, Issue 2, 2012
- ALL IS NOT FORGIVEN—THE APPLICATION OF CPLR 2001 TO MENDON PONDS DEFECTSPeter McGowan
- LIGHTING THE WAY: THE LIGHTHOUSE DECISION AND JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTIONDaniel Riesel
- THE RELOCATION DILEMMA: IN SEARCH OF BEST INTERESTSRuth Sovronsky
- NEW YORK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW REVIEWDavid P. Miranda
- DISSENTING AT NEW YORK‘S FEDERAL APPEALS COURT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF SECOND CIRCUIT DISSENTS AND THE FREQUENT DISSENTER, JUDGE ROSEMARY POOLERJessica N. Clemente
- INSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATISM AND ITS IMPACT ON APPELLATE DECISION-MAKING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUITRobert J. Brenner
- STAYING TRUE TO THE IDEALS OF FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE DISSENTS OF JUDGE STRAUBDanielle L. Levine
- DECISION-MAKING AT THE SECOND CIRCUIT: JUDGES BARRINGTON D. PARKER, JR. AND ROBERT D. SACKChristina L. Shifton
- CONSERVATISM IN THE SECOND CIRCUIT: AN ANALYSIS OF THE DISSENTING OPINIONS OF JUDGE DEBRA LIVINGSTON & JUDGE REENA RAGGIMichael C. Tedesco
- TRIBUTE TO CHIEF JUDGE JONATHAN LIPPMANCyrus R. Vance Jr.
- JUSTICE, JUSTICE, SHALL YOU PURSUE FOR RICH AND POOR, HIGH AND LOW ALIKELillian M. Moy
- CLERKING FOR THE CHIEFCameron Moxley
- MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE: A CLERK’S PERSPECTIVE OF CHIEF JUDGE JONATHANLIPPMANMargaret Nyland Wood
- EVERYONE’S CHIEF—A TRIBUTE TO CHIEF JUDGE JONATHAN LIPPMANPatrick A. Woods
- INTRODUCTION TO THE HONORABLE HUGH R. JONES MEMORIAL LECTUREJonathan Lippman
- FEDERALISM IS ALIVE AND WELL AND LIVING IN NEW YORKSol Wachtler
- NEW YORK TAX WARRANTS: IN THE STRANGE WORLD OF DEEMED JUDGMENTSDavid Gray CarlsonCarlton M. Smith
- WHEN DOES A GAMBLING PROHIBITION NOT PROHIBIT GAMBLING? OR AN ALTERNATIVE MAD HATTER‘S RIDDLE AND HOW IT HELPS US TO UNDERSTAND CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN NEW YORKGerald Benjamin
- THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT OPINION AND THE BASES OF EXPERT OPINION IN SEX OFFENDER CIVIL MANAGEMENT TRIALS IN NEW YORKColleen D. Duffy
- SHOULD WE BE TALKING? BEGINNING A DIALOGUE ON GUARDIANSHIP FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED IN NEW YORKRose Mary BaillyCharis B. Nick-Torok
- OVERRULING BY IMPLICATION AND THE CONSEQUENT BURDEN UPON BENCH AND BARBrian J. Shoot
- WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF YOUR APPEAL AS OF RIGHT LACKS A SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION IN THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS?Alan J. Pierce
- CIVIL FORFEITURE AS A REMEDY FOR CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CONTRACTING IN NEW YORKJohn P. Woods
- JUDGE BERNARD S. MEYER: FIRST MERIT APPOINTEE TO THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALSVincent R. Johnson
Rose Mary Bailly & Charis B. Nick-Torok, SHOULD WE BE TALKING? BEGINNING A DIALOGUE ON GUARDIANSHIP FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED IN NEW YORK, 75 Albany Law Review (2012).