P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 74, Issue 2, 2011March 03, 2011 EDT
PLEADING FRAUD IN NEW YORK: CPLR 3016(B)'S HEIGHTENED PLEADING STANDARD AND WHY IT’S IMPORTANT
PLEADING FRAUD IN NEW YORK: CPLR 3016(B)'S HEIGHTENED PLEADING STANDARD AND WHY IT’S IMPORTANT
James G. Cavoli, Matthew J. Laroche,
CPLR 3016(b)notice standardpleading standardparticularity in specific actionsPludeman v. Northern Leasing SystemsInc.frauddetails constituting the wrong
Articles in Vol. 74, Issue 2, 2011
Vol. 74, Issue 2, 2011
- TABLE OF CONTENTSAlbany Law Review
- STATE & LOCAL ECONOMIC SANCTIONS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NEW YORK'S DIVESTMENT ACTIONS AND THE SUDAN ACCOUNTABILITY & DIVESTMENT ACT OF 2007Elizabeth Trachy
- NEW YORK APPEALS: AN EVOLVING TRADITIONJessica R. Vigars
- LOST PROFITS FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT: WOULD THE COURT OF APPEALS APPLY THE SECOND CURCUITS ANALYSIS?Glen Banks
- A PREVAILING PARTY CAN STILL BE A "SORE" WINNER ON APPEAL UNDER CPLR 5501(A)(1); RAISING ALTERNATIVE ARGUMENTS THAT NECESSARILY AFFECT THE FINAL JUDGEMENT TO ENSURE WINNING ON APPEALJoseph F. Castiglione
- PLEADING FRAUD IN NEW YORK: CPLR 3016(B)'S HEIGHTENED PLEADING STANDARD AND WHY IT'S IMPORTANTJames G. CavoliMatthew J. Laroche
- NEW YORK STATE CLASS ACTIONS: MAKE IT WORK-FULFILL THE PROMISEThomas A. Dickerson
- A PRACTIONER'S CONTINUED UNCERTAINTY: DISCLOSURE FROM NONPARTIESDavid L. Ferstendig
- RECENT INTERPRETATIONS OF THE CPLR BY NEW YORK APPELLATE COURTSBarbara D. GoldbergRichard J. Montes
- THE ARBITRATION FAIRNESS ACT: PERFORMING SURGERY WITH A HATCHET INSTEAD OF A SCALPEL?Jyotin HamidEmily J. Mathieu
- THE CONTROVERSIAL CONTRADICTION BETWEEN TRADITION PRECEDENT AND RECENT FAILURE TO WARN JURISPRUDENCE IN NEW YORKDwight A. KernDavid S. Kostus
- WHAT DO GRAPES AND FEDERAL LAWSUITS HAVEIN COMMON? BOTH MUST BE RIPEWilliam Maker Jr.
- PRESS FREEDOM AND PRIVATE PEOPLE: THE LIFE AND TIMES (AND FUTURE) OF CHAPADEAU V. UTICA OBSERVER-DISPATCHDavid E. McCraw
- DISSENTING: WHY DO IT?Robert S. Smith
- DISSENT & VINDICATION IN THE DEPARTMENTS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDYCaitlain Devereaux Lewis
- QUALITY IN NUMBERS? THE DYNAMICS OF DECISION-MAKING IN THE SECOND DEPARTMENTKristopher Ostrander
- AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF DISSENT AT THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENTChristopher J. Stevens
- AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE VINDICATED DISSENTS OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, FROM 2000 TO 2010Daniel Gross
- CLOSING THE LOOPHOLE: SHEA'S LAW AND DWI BLOOD DRAWS IN NEW YORK STATE UNDER VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW 1194(4)(A)(1)Daniel Gross
- THE TRUTH BEHIND "FINAL AND BINDING" ARBITRATION: A STUDY OF VACATED ARBITRATION AWARDS IN THE NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISIONMonica R. Skanes
James G. Cavoli & Matthew J. Laroche, PLEADING FRAUD IN NEW YORK: CPLR 3016(B)’S HEIGHTENED PLEADING STANDARD AND WHY IT’S IMPORTANT, 74 Albany Law Review (2011).