This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:38963/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
General
Vol. 69, Issue 3, 2006January 01, 2006 EDT

TO UNDERSTAND FOREIGN COURT CITATION: DISSECTING ORIGINALISM, DYNAMISM, ROMANTICISM, AND CONSEQUENTIALISM

Saby Ghoshray,
foreign court citationforeign court precedentcomprehensive theoryjurisprudential methodologies

Articles in Vol. 69, Issue 3, 2006

Vol. 69, Issue 3, 2006
  • “OUTSOURCING AUTHORITY?” CITATION TO FOREIGN COURT PRECEDENT IN DOMESTIC JURISPRUDENCE & REFINEMENT OR REINVENTION: THE STATE OF REFORM IN NEW YORK
    James W. Leary
  • SYMPOSIUM: A SECOND-CLASS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT? FREE EXERCISE AND THE CURRENT STATE OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN THE UNITED STATES
    Vincent Martin Bonventre
  • FOUR MISTAKES IN THE DEBATE ON “OUTSOURCING AUTHORITY”
    Roger P. Alford
  • CITING FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW TO INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION: WHAT’S THE POINT?
    John S. Baker Jr.
  • FOREIGN LAW AND OPINION IN STATE COURTS
    Mark Wendell DeLaquil
  • TO UNDERSTAND FOREIGN COURT CITATION: DISSECTING ORIGINALISM, DYNAMISM, ROMANTICISM, AND CONSEQUENTIALISM
    Saby Ghoshray
  • BRIEFLY RESUSCITATING THE GREAT WRIT: THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE U.S. DEATH PENALTY
    Susan L. Karamanian
  • THE SUPREME COURT AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY
    Ken I. Kersch
  • CONTEMPORARY FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION
    John O. McGinnis
  • “A DECENT RESPECT TO THE OPINIONS OF MANKIND”: REFERRING TO FOREIGN LAW TO EXPRESS AMERICAN NATIONHOOD
    Mark Tushnet
  • CITATION BY U.S. COURTS TO DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE CASES
    Lawrence R. Walders
  • SYMPOSIUM: REFINEMENT OR REINVENTION: THE STATE OF REFORM IN NEW YORK
    Patricia E. Salkin
  • CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE H. COOKE
    Judith S. Kaye
  • GOVERNEMENT REFORM FROM AN EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVE
    Richard Platkin
  • WHY SHOULD I HAVE TO TELL THEM? THE NECESSARY ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN ACHIEVING REFORM
    Evan Davis
  • THE NECESSITY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
    Gerald Benjamin
  • NEW YORK’S IMMEDIATE NEED FOR A PSYCHOTHERAPIST-PATIENT PRIVILEGE ENCOMPASSING PSYCHIATRISTS, PSYCHOLOGISTS, AND SOCIAL WORKERS
    Rebecca S. Auerbach
  • UNWISE AND UNNECESSARY: STATUTORY CAPS ON NON-ECONOMIC DAMAGES IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES AND THE APPELLATE REVIEW ALTERNATIVE
    Ryan T. Emery
Albany Law Review
Saby Ghoshray, TO UNDERSTAND FOREIGN COURT CITATION: DISSECTING ORIGINALISM, DYNAMISM, ROMANTICISM, AND CONSEQUENTIALISM, 69 Albany Law Review (2006).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system