Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Albany Law Review
New York Appeals
RE-EXAMINING NEW YORK‘S LAW OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AFTER GOODYEAR DUNLOP TIRES OPERATIONS, S.A. V. BROWNAND J. MCINTYRE MACHINERY, LTD. V. NICASTRO
Oscar G. ChaseLori Brooke Day
After the Supreme Court's decisions in McIntyre and Nicastro, when faced with conflicting rulings on personal jurisdiction, the New York courts should follow Court of Appeals precedent.
New York Appeals
NEW YORK‘S APPELLATE COURTS WRESTLE WITH SIGNIFICANT ISSUES IN INTERNET DEFAMATION CASES
Alan J. Pierce
This article examines how New York state appellate courts have applied internet-defamation principles after the Court of Appeals rulings in Lunney v. Prodigy Services Co., and Firth v. State.
New York Appeals
THE CONTEXTUAL REZONING OF SUNSET PARK, BROOKLYN, AND THE DECISION IN CHINESE STAFF & WORKERS’ ASSSOCIATION V. BURDEN: THE BASIC PRINCIPLES GOVERNING LIMITED JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES IN NEW YORK ENDURE
Elizabeth S. Natrella
This article examines two New York State Court of Appeals cases: Chinese Staff & Workers Association v. City of New York and Chinese Staff & Workers’ Association v. Burden.
New York Appeals
FOREWARNED: SPORTS, TORTS, AND NEW YORK‘S DANGEROUS ASSUMPTION
Benjamin P. Pomerance
For decades New York state courts in torts cases have blanketly applied the assumption of risk doctrine and barred recovery rather than taking a more equitable approach under comparative negligence.
New York Appeals
A NEU NEUMEIER: THE NEED FOR A MORE FLEXIBLE FRAMEWORK FOR CHOICE OF LAW IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Elie Salamon
The Court of Appeals opinion in Edwards v. Erie Coach Lines Co., which applied New York‘s choice of law principles highlighted the rules' deficiencies to render fair and equitable results.
Load More

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.