This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:34095/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Justice Commentaries
Vol. 87, Issue 3, 2024February 26, 2024 EDT

JUDGING FEDERAL DEFENSE SYSTEMS: DOES THE TYPE OF COUNSEL REPRESENTING DEFENDANTS INFLUENCE OUTCOMES IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT?

Richard D. Hartley, Kelly Roberts Freeman, Bryce Peterson,
justicefederal public defenderspublic defendersCJA attorneycriminal justice
Photo by Marten Bjork on Unsplash
Albany Law Review
Richard D. Hartley, Kelly Roberts Freeman & Bryce Peterson, JUDGING FEDERAL DEFENSE SYSTEMS:  DOES THE TYPE OF COUNSEL REPRESENTING DEFENDANTS INFLUENCE OUTCOMES IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT?, 87 Albany Law Review 755 (2024).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system