This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:34495/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
State Constitutional Commentary
Vol. 79, Issue 4, 2017May 05, 2017 EDT

WHERE SCIENCE CONFLICTS WITH COMMON SENSE: EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION REFORM IN MASSACHUSETTS

Ralph D. Gants, Erik N. Doughty,
eyewitness identificationSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusettswrongful convictionsSupreme Judicial Court Study Group on Eyewitness IdentificationCommonwealth v. CraytonCommonwealth v. CollinsCommonwealth v. Gomesshowup identifications
Albany Law Review
Ralph D. Gants & Erik N. Doughty, WHERE SCIENCE CONFLICTS WITH COMMON SENSE: EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION REFORM IN MASSACHUSETTS, 79 Albany Law Review (2017).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system