Vol. 77, Issue 4, 2015January 05, 2015 EDT
“OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR PRECEDENTS, AND [OUR] OWN BEST HUMAN JUDGMENTS:” A SURVEY OF FREE EXERCISE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN THE WAKE OF OREGON V. SMITH.
“OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR PRECEDENTS, AND [OUR] OWN BEST HUMAN JUDGMENTS:” A SURVEY OF FREE EXERCISE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN THE WAKE OF OREGON V. SMITH.
Robert McIver,
free exercise of religionOregon v. SmithNew FederalismNew York State Constitutionfederalist systemreligious libertiesstate constitutional protectionsFirst Amendment
Robert McIver, “OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR PRECEDENTS, AND [OUR] OWN BEST HUMAN JUDGMENTS:” A SURVEY OF FREE EXERCISE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN THE WAKE OF OREGON V. SMITH., 77 Albany Law Review (2015).