Vol. 81, Issue 3, 2018July 17, 2018 EDT
PICKING AND CHOOSING: INCONSISTENT USE OF NEUROSCIENTIFIC LEGAL EVIDENCE
PICKING AND CHOOSING: INCONSISTENT USE OF NEUROSCIENTIFIC LEGAL EVIDENCE
neuroscience relevancy reliability validity false positives evidence Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm. Frye v. United States brain defense pain and suffering
Joseph J. Avery, PICKING AND CHOOSING: INCONSISTENT USE OF NEUROSCIENTIFIC LEGAL EVIDENCE, 81 Albany Law Review (2018).
Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system