This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:5765/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
General
Vol. 79, Issue 2, 2016June 15, 2016 EDT

MATCHING THE TRAJECTORY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY DEFENSE: A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE STATES

Noah Cyr Engelhart,
Bill of RightsHall v. Floridaintellectual disability defenseEighth Amendmentcruel and unusual punishmentcapital punishmenthuman dignity
Albany Law Review
Noah Cyr Engelhart, MATCHING THE TRAJECTORY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY DEFENSE: A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE STATES, 79 Albany Law Review (2016).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system