Vol. 78, Issue 1, 2015February 13, 2015 EDT
THAT’S (NOT) WHAT SHE SAID: THE CASE FOR EXPANDING ADMISSION OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS IN NEW YORK CRIMINAL TRIALS
THAT’S (NOT) WHAT SHE SAID: THE CASE FOR EXPANDING ADMISSION OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS IN NEW YORK CRIMINAL TRIALS
Steven V. DeBraccio,
prior inconsistent statementshearsay evidenceunfair prejudicelimiting instructionseyewitness testimonydefendants’ rightsfact findingout-of-court statement
Steven V. DeBraccio, THAT’S (NOT) WHAT SHE SAID: THE CASE FOR EXPANDING ADMISSION OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS IN NEW YORK CRIMINAL TRIALS, 78 Albany Law Review (2015).