This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:16466/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Justice Commentaries
Vol. 81, Issue 3, 2018July 17, 2018 EDT

THE BEST INSURANCE AGAINST MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE CAUSED BY JUNK SCIENCE: AN ADMISSIBILITY TEST THAT IS SCIENTIFICALLY AND LEGALLY SOUND

Edward J. Imwinkelried,
expert testimonyFederal Rules of Evidencewrongful convictionsscientific evidenceerroneous testimonyadmissabilityrelevant evidenceprejudicial evidenceSupreme Court
Albany Law Review
Edward J. Imwinkelried, THE BEST INSURANCE AGAINST MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE CAUSED BY JUNK SCIENCE: AN ADMISSIBILITY TEST THAT IS SCIENTIFICALLY AND LEGALLY SOUND, 81 Albany Law Review (2018).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system