Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:14330/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
New York Appeals
Vol. 79, Issue 4, 2017May 05, 2017 EDT

PATERNO V. LASER SPINE INSTITUTE: DID THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS’ MISAPPLICATION OF UNJUSTIFIED POLICY FEARS LEAD TO A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND THE CREATION OF INADEQUATE PRECEDENT FOR THE PROPER USE OF THE EMPIRE STATE’S LONG-ARM STATUTE?

Jay C. Carlisle, Christine Murphy, Kiersten Schramek, Marley Strauss,
Paterno v. Laser Spine InstituteCPLR 302(a)(1)New York State Court of Appealsjurisdictionlong-arm jurisdictionspecific jurisdictionnon-domiciliary
Albany Law Review
Jay C. Carlisle et al., PATERNO V. LASER SPINE INSTITUTE: DID THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS’ MISAPPLICATION OF UNJUSTIFIED POLICY FEARS LEAD TO A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND THE CREATION OF INADEQUATE PRECEDENT FOR THE PROPER USE OF THE EMPIRE STATE’S LONG-ARM STATUTE?, 79 Albany Law Review (2017).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system