This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:33472/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
General
Vol. 82, Issue 1, 2018December 12, 2018 EDT

DON’T BE DISTRACTED BY THE PEACOCK TRYING TO BOARD AN AIRPLANE: WHY EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMALS ARE SERVICE ANIMALS AND SHOULD BE REGULATED IN THE SAME MANNER.

Amanda M. Foster,
mental illnessemotional support animalstherapy animalsAmericans with Disabilities Actmental health stigmainvisible disabilitiesservice animals
Albany Law Review
Amanda M. Foster, DON’T BE DISTRACTED BY THE PEACOCK TRYING TO BOARD AN AIRPLANE: WHY EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMALS ARE SERVICE ANIMALS AND SHOULD BE REGULATED IN THE SAME MANNER., 82 Albany Law Review (2018).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system