This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:25642/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Justice Commentaries
Vol. 79, Issue 3, 2016May 02, 2016 EDT

MENTAL COMPETENCY LAW AND PLEA BARGAINING: A NEUROPHENOMENOLOGICAL CRITIQUE

Robert Schehr, Ph.D, Chelsea French,
plea-bargainingmental competency to pleaneuropsychologycognitive psychologydeath is different jurisprudenceunreliability principleEighth Amendmentindividualized consideration
Albany Law Review
Robert Schehr & Chelsea French, MENTAL COMPETENCY LAW AND PLEA BARGAINING: A NEUROPHENOMENOLOGICAL CRITIQUE, 79 Albany Law Review (2016).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system