P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 83, Issue 3, 2020September 27, 2020 EDT
THE BITE MARK DENTISTS AND THE COUNTERATTACK ON FORENSIC SCIENCE REFORM
THE BITE MARK DENTISTS AND THE COUNTERATTACK ON FORENSIC SCIENCE REFORM
Marvin Zalman, James Windell,
forensic evidencebite mark evidencewrongful convictionEpidermis and Enamelunreliabilitybite mark analysisforensic odontologistsadmissibility
Articles in Vol. 83, Issue 3, 2020
Vol. 83, Issue 3, 2020
- ADRIFT IN THE INTERSTICES OF LAW AND JUSTICE: DIVINING RIGHT AND WRONG IN THE SAD, STRANGE CASE OF PEOPLE V. SCHMIDTJames R. Acker
- THE BITE MARK DENTISTS AND THE COUNTERATTACK ON FORENSIC SCIENCE REFORMMarvin ZalmanJames Windell
- OBSTACLES AND BARRIERS AFTER EXONERATIONLily GoldbergNicole GuillenNicole HernandezLora M. Levett
- INDEPENDENT CRITICAL INCIDENT INVESTIGATION AGENCIES: A UNIQUE FORM OF POLICE OVERSIGHTRichard A. Rosenthal
- APPLYING THE STAMP SAFETY MODEL TO PREVENT FALSE CONVICTIONS BASED ON EYEWITNESS MISIDENTIFICATIONSBoaz Sangero
- THE RAGE AGAINST THE FELONY MURDER RULE TRAP WHEN JUVENILES ARE PROSECUTED FOR MURDER IN CO-FELON KILLINGSDerrick Augustus Carter
- POSTCONVICTION INNOCENCE REVIEW IN THE AGE OF PROGRESSIVE PROSECUTIONElizabeth Webster
- PERCEPTIONS OF EXONEREES: A REVIEW OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCELakia FaisonLaura Smalarz
Marvin Zalman & James Windell, THE BITE MARK DENTISTS AND THE COUNTERATTACK ON FORENSIC SCIENCE REFORM, 83 Albany Law Review (2020).