Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Miscarriages of Justice
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://www.albanylawreview.org/feed
×
New York Appeals
Vol. 77, Issue 1, 2014January 01, 2014 EDT

NEW YORK CITY TAXIS AND THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE: WHAT IS LEFT OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION‘S HOME RULE CLAUSE AFTER THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN THE HAIL ACT CASE?

Roberta A. Kaplan,
Court of Appeals New York City home rule state and local government state constitution Dillon's rule substantial state interest Greater N.Y. Taxi Ass‘n v. State New York state legislature
Albany Law Review
Roberta A. Kaplan, NEW YORK CITY TAXIS AND THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE: WHAT IS LEFT OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION‘S HOME RULE CLAUSE AFTER THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN THE HAIL ACT CASE?, 77 Albany Law Review (2014).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system