Vol. 77, Issue 1, 2014January 01, 2014 EDT
NEW YORK CITY TAXIS AND THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE: WHAT IS LEFT OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION‘S HOME RULE CLAUSE AFTER THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN THE HAIL ACT CASE?
NEW YORK CITY TAXIS AND THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE: WHAT IS LEFT OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION‘S HOME RULE CLAUSE AFTER THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN THE HAIL ACT CASE?
Court of Appeals New York City home rule state and local government state constitution Dillon's rule substantial state interest Greater N.Y. Taxi Ass‘n v. State New York state legislature
Roberta A. Kaplan, NEW YORK CITY TAXIS AND THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE: WHAT IS LEFT OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION‘S HOME RULE CLAUSE AFTER THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN THE HAIL ACT CASE?, 77 Albany Law Review (2014).
Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system