P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 77, Issue 1, 2014January 01, 2014 EDT
NEW YORK CITY TAXIS AND THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE: WHAT IS LEFT OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION‘S HOME RULE CLAUSE AFTER THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN THE HAIL ACT CASE?
NEW YORK CITY TAXIS AND THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE: WHAT IS LEFT OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION‘S HOME RULE CLAUSE AFTER THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN THE HAIL ACT CASE?
Roberta A. Kaplan,
Court of AppealsNew York Cityhome rulestate and local governmentstate constitutionDillon's rulesubstantial state interestGreater N.Y. Taxi Ass‘n v. StateNew York state legislature
Roberta A. Kaplan, NEW YORK CITY TAXIS AND THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE: WHAT IS LEFT OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION‘S HOME RULE CLAUSE AFTER THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN THE HAIL ACT CASE?, 77 Albany Law Review (2014).