This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:34095/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
State Constitutional Commentary
Vol. 76, Issue 4, 2013September 23, 2013 EDT

A JUDICIAL TRADITIONALIST CONFRONTS UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ADJUDICATION

Robert P. Young Jr.,
significant independent meaningdirect democracyconstitutional interpretationMichigan Supreme CourtMichigan Constitutiondirect democracy provision
Albany Law Review
Robert P. Young, A JUDICIAL TRADITIONALIST CONFRONTS UNIQUE QUESTIONS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ADJUDICATION, 76 Albany Law Review (2013).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system