Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:38963/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Justice Commentaries
Vol. 76, Issue 3, 2013June 11, 2013 EDT

Table of Contents

Albany Law Review,
table of contents

Articles in Vol. 76, Issue 3, 2013

Vol. 76, Issue 3, 2013
  • Table of Contents
    Albany Law Review
  • FOREWORD
    Vincent Martin Bonventre
  • ENSURING VICTIM SAFETY AND ABUSER ACCOUNTABILITY: REFORMS AND REVISIONS IN NEW YORK COURTS RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    Jonathan Lippman
  • HOW THE PROMPT OUTCRY RULE PROTECTS THE GUILTY
    Robert S. Smith
  • A SURVEY OF FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS‘ APPROACHES TO A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE: IS THERE A NEED FOR A STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT IN NEW YORK IN THE AFTERMATH OF CPL § 440.10(G-1)?
    John M. Leventhal
  • DOUBLE JEOPARDY
    Salvatore R. MartocheDonald S. Stefanski
  • THE RISE AND FALL OF NEW YORK‘S ROGERS-BARTOLOMEO RULE
    Mark C. DillonLewis J. Lubell
  • LENIENCY AS A MISCARRIAGE OF RACE AND GENDER JUSTICE
    Aya Gruber
  • THE FLIPSIDE INJUSTICE OF WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS: WHEN THE GUILTY GO FREE
    James R. Acker
  • SIDESTEPPING JUSTICE? ADJOURNMENTS IN CONTEMPLATION OF DISMISSAL IN MISDEMEANOR COURT
    Alissa Pollitz WordenSarah J. McLeanMegan Kennedy
  • THE DIALECTICS OF RACIAL GENETICS
    Christian B. Sundquist
  • DE-NATURALIZING CRIMINAL LAW: OF PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS AND PROCEDURAL PROTECTIONS
    Benjamin Levin
  • TAKING CONFRONTATION SERIOUSLY: DOES CRAWFORD MEAN THAT CONFESSIONS MUST BE CROSS-EXAMINED?
    Mark A. Summers
  • THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE, NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE, AND AN "UNOFFICIAL" EXCEPTION TO DOUBLE JEOPARDY: A COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
    Steven V. DeBraccio
  • CRYING OUT FOR CHANGE: A CALL FOR A NEW CHILD ABUSE HEARSAY EXCEPTION IN NEW YORK STATE
    Christopher T. Fell
Albany Law Review
Albany Law Review, Table of Contents, 76 Albany Law Review (2013).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system