This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:16466/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
General
Vol. 76, Issue 1, 2013January 01, 2013 EDT

THE OPINIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL: HOW AND WHY THEY ARE SIGNIFICANT

Arthur H. Garrison,
Office of Legal CounselExecutive BranchOffice of the Attorney Generalexecutive decision-makingrule of lawJudiciary Act of 1789Assistant Solicitor Generallegal advice to the White House
Albany Law Review
Arthur H. Garrison, THE OPINIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL: HOW AND WHY THEY ARE SIGNIFICANT, 76 Albany Law Review (2013).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system