This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:4849/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
New York Appeals
Vol. 73, Issue 3, 2010May 05, 2010 EDT

CHIEF JUDGE JONATHAN LIPPMAN: A NEW ERA

Matthew J. Laroche,
Chief Judge Jonathan LippmanNew York State Court of AppealsProgressiveVoting Patterns

Articles in Vol. 73, Issue 3, 2010

Vol. 73, Issue 3, 2010
  • THE INDEPENDENT JURIST: AN ANALYSIS OF JUDGE ROBERT S. SMITH’S DISSENTING OPINIONS
    Peter A. Mancuso
  • THE PERT PERPENDER: ASSOCIATE JUDGE EUGENE F. PIGOTT, JR.’S JOURNEY FROM BUFFALO TO ROCHESTER AND ALBANY
    Benjamin L. Loefke
  • THEODORE T. JONES, THE DEFENDANT’S CHAMPION: REVIEWING A SAMPLE OF JUDGE JONES’S CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE
    Erika L. Winkler
  • THE ALBANY NINE: RECOGNIZING ALBANY LAW SCHOOL’S ALUMNI JUSTICES OF THE THIRD DEPARTMENT
    Jonathan D. Gillerman
  • NEW YORK APPEALS: A NEW TRADITION
    Matthew J. LarochePeter M. McCormack
  • THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, ALBANY LAW SCHOOL, AND THE ALBANY LAW REVIEW: INSTITUTIONS DEDICATED TO THE EVOLUTION OF THE LAW IN NEW YORK STATE
    Jonathan Lippman
  • A TRIBUTE TO PRESIDING JUSTICE ANTHONY V. CARDONA: THE CORE VALUES OF COURTESY AND RESPECT DISPLAYED IN JURISPRUDENCE AND COURT ADMINISTRATION
    Thomas E. Mercure
  • A TRIBUTE TO PRESIDING JUSTICE ANTHONY V. CARDONA: VISION AND RESOLVE
    Michael J. Novack
  • A TRIBUTE TO PRESIDING JUSTICE ANTHONY V. CARDONA: A JURIST WHO HAS ALWAYS SOUGHT TO “DO THE RIGHT THING” IN THE LAW AND IN LIFE
    Michele McKay
  • SKELOS V. PATERSON: THE SURPRISINGLY STRONG CASE FOR THE GOVERNOR’S SURPRISING POWER TO APPOINT A LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
    Richard Briffault
  • THE COURT OF APPEALS'S DECISION IN GODFREY V. SPANO: A TROUBLING EXERCISE OF INDECISION
    Roberta Kaplan
  • LINE IN THE SAND: PROGRESSIVE LAWYERING, “MASTER COMMUNITIES,” AND A BATTLE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN NEW YORK CITY
    Raymond H. Brescia
  • IF THE SYSTEM IS NOT WORKING LET’S FIX IT: WHY SEVEN JUDGES ARE BETTER THAN ONE FOR DECIDING CRIMINAL LEAVE APPLICATIONS AT THE COURT OF APPEALS
    Alan J. Pierce
  • A NULLITY OR NOT?—THE STATUS OF A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED ABSENT COMPLIANCE WITH CPLR 3215(F)
    John R. Higgitt
  • DEPENDENT UPON THE KINDNESS OF STRANGERS: THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH A NON-APPELLANT MAY BE AWARDED AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF IN THE NEW YORK COURTS
    Brian J. Shoot
  • CPLR 3126 CONDITIONAL ORDERS REQUIRING DISCLOSURE “CAN’T GET NO RESPECT”
    Patrick M. Connors
  • TOWARD THE LIPPMAN COURT: FLUX AND TRANSITION AT NEW YORK’S COURT OF APPEALS
    Vincent Martin Bonventre
  • CHIEF JUDGE JONATHAN LIPPMAN: A NEW ERA
    Matthew J. Laroche
  • JUDGE CARMEN BEAUCHAMP CIPARICK: A GLIMPSE INTO THE SENIOR ASSOCIATE JUDGE’S JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY THROUGH HER DISSENTS
    Jillian Kasow
  • JUDGE VICTORIA A. GRAFFEO: COMMITTED, CONSERVATIVE, COLLEGIAL
    Jeremy A. Cooney
  • HOW TO WIN THE READ VOTE: A PROFILE OF THE STATUTORY INTERPRETATION METHOD OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE SUSAN P. READ FROM A PRACTICAL VIEWPOINT
    Sanjeev Devabhakthuni
Albany Law Review
Matthew J. Laroche, CHIEF JUDGE JONATHAN LIPPMAN: A NEW ERA, 73 Albany Law Review (2010).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system