Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Miscarriages of Justice
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://www.albanylawreview.org/feed
×
State Constitutional Commentary
Vol. 71, Issue 4, 2009August 08, 2009 EDT

THROWING STONES FROM WITHIN A GLASS HOUSE: WHY THE PROCEDURAL APPROACH TO CONFRONTATION FAILS TO REMEDY THE ILLS OF THE INDICIA OF RELIABILITY TEST, AND AN ARGUMENT FOR A BALANCED RULE

Gordon Eddy,
Crawford v. Washington testimonial confrontation clause ex parte testimonial statements confrontation rights discovery of truth
Albany Law Review
Gordon Eddy, THROWING STONES FROM WITHIN A GLASS HOUSE: WHY THE PROCEDURAL APPROACH TO CONFRONTATION FAILS TO REMEDY THE ILLS OF THE INDICIA OF RELIABILITY TEST, AND AN ARGUMENT FOR A BALANCED RULE, 71 Albany Law Review (2009).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system