P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 71, Issue 4, 2009August 08, 2009 EDT
WE’RE FROM VERMONT AND WE DO WHAT WE WANT: A “RE”-EXAMINATION OF THE CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE OF THE VERMONT SUPREME COURT
WE’RE FROM VERMONT AND WE DO WHAT WE WANT: A “RE”-EXAMINATION OF THE CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE OF THE VERMONT SUPREME COURT
Nathan Sabourin,
Vermont Supreme Courtcriminal jurisprudenceliberal judicial philosophyCrime Control Modelcriminal adjudication
Articles in Vol. 71, Issue 4, 2009
Vol. 71, Issue 4, 2009
- FOREWORDVincent Martin Bonventre
- JUDGES ON JUDGES: THE NEW YORK STATE COURT OF APPEALS JUDGES’ OWN FAVORITES IN COURT HISTORYVincent Martin Bonventre
- INTRODUCTIONAlbert M. Rosenblatt
- CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE H. COOKEJudith S. Kaye
- JUDGE VITO J. TITONECarmen Beauchamp Ciparick
- JUDGE FRANCIS BERGANVictoria A. Graffeo
- CHIEF JUDGE JOHN T. LOUGHRANSusan Phillips Read
- CHIEF JUDGE CUTHBERT POUNDRobert S. Smith
- JUDGE MATTHEW J. JASENEugene F. Pigott Jr.
- JUDGE HAROLD A. STEVENSTheodore T. Jones Jr.
- EDUCATIONAL ISSUES AND JUDICIAL OVERSIGHTStanley H. Friedelbaum
- A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR ADVANCING ANIMAL RIGHTSDiane M. SullivanHolly VietzkeMichael L. Coyne
- THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDEPENDENT NEW YORK CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE IN CHIEF JUDGE KAYE’S JUDICIAL OPINIONS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDYGordon Eddy
- WE’RE FROM VERMONT AND WE DO WHAT WE WANT: A “RE”-EXAMINATION OF THE CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE OF THE VERMONT SUPREME COURTNathan Sabourin
- STATE CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION IN A FOOTNOTE? A CRITIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA’S DECISION IN STATE V. KENNEDYKevin Blackwell
- THE “SILVER PLATTER” IN THE CONTEXT OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATIONMartin McGuinness
- BATTLING THE THREAT: THE SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AFTER DAVIS V. WASHINGTONKatherine G. Breitenbach
- THROWING STONES FROM WITHIN A GLASS HOUSE: WHY THE PROCEDURAL APPROACH TO CONFRONTATION FAILS TO REMEDY THE ILLS OF THE INDICIA OF RELIABILITY TEST, AND AN ARGUMENT FOR A BALANCED RULEGordon Eddy
Nathan Sabourin, WE’RE FROM VERMONT AND WE DO WHAT WE WANT: A “RE”-EXAMINATION OF THE CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE OF THE VERMONT SUPREME COURT, 71 Albany Law Review (2009).