This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:33472/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
General
Vol. 70, Issue 4, 2007August 08, 2007 EDT

CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY OVER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY AFTER ELDRED V. ASHCROFT: DEFERENCE, EMPTY LIMITATIONS, AND RISKS TO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN

David E. Shipley,
Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998Eldred v. Ashcroftcopyright clausepublic domainLanham Actintellectual property laws
Albany Law Review
David E. Shipley, CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY OVER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY AFTER ELDRED V. ASHCROFT: DEFERENCE, EMPTY LIMITATIONS, AND RISKS TO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, 70 Albany Law Review (2007).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system