P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 69, Issue 4, 2006January 01, 2006 EDT
TRUSTEE-BENEFICIARIES, CREDITORS, AND NEW YORK’S EPTL: THE SURPRISES THAT RESULT AND HOW THE UTC SOLVES THEM
TRUSTEE-BENEFICIARIES, CREDITORS, AND NEW YORK’S EPTL: THE SURPRISES THAT RESULT AND HOW THE UTC SOLVES THEM
Victoria Hasseler,
trustbeneficiarytrust fundssettlordiscretionary distributionscreditormerger doctrinepower of appointmentpower of withdrawal
Articles in Vol. 69, Issue 4, 2006
Vol. 69, Issue 4, 2006
- FROM PROXY TO PRINCIPLE: FRAUDULENT JOINDER RECONSIDEREDJames M. Underwood
- JUSTICE JACKSON’S DRAFT OPINIONS IN THE STEEL SEIZURE CASESAdam J. White
- TAKING PRIVATE PROPERTY TO BUILD AN URBAN SPORTS ARENA: A VALID EXERCISE OF EMINENT DOMAIN POWERS?Giovanna D'Orazio
- TRUSTEE-BENEFICIARIES, CREDITORS, AND NEW YORK’S EPTL: THE SURPRISES THAT RESULT AND HOW THE UTC SOLVES THEMVictoria Hasseler
- A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE MECHANISMS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN NEW YORK AND THE FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE INITIATIVE POWERJerald A. Sharum
- POSTHUMOUS PATERNITY TESTING: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND EPTL 4-1.2(a)(2)(D)Ilene Sherwyn Cooper
- INTRODUCTIONAlbert M. Rosenblatt
- MINNESOTA REPUBLICAN PARTY V. WHITE AND THE FUTURE OF STATE JUDICIAL SELECTIONDavid Schultz
Victoria Hasseler, TRUSTEE-BENEFICIARIES, CREDITORS, AND NEW YORK’S EPTL: THE SURPRISES THAT RESULT AND HOW THE UTC SOLVES THEM, 69 Albany Law Review (2006).