This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:52118/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
General
Vol. 86, Issue 1, 2022January 09, 2023 EDT

FORCE OF HABIT? CONSIDERING THE RELEVANCE OF POST-INCIDENT EVIDENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 406

Marc D. Ginsberg, Hugh M. Mundy,
habitevidenceFRE 406freely admissibleroutine practicepost-incident conductpre-incident habitadmissibilitysemi-automaticrepetition
Photo by Nasser Eledroos on Unsplash
Albany Law Review
Marc D. Ginsberg & Hugh M. Mundy, FORCE OF HABIT? CONSIDERING THE RELEVANCE OF POST-INCIDENT EVIDENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 406, 86 Albany Law Review 1 (2023).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system