P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 86, Issue 1, 2022January 09, 2023 EDT
FORCE OF HABIT? CONSIDERING THE RELEVANCE OF POST-INCIDENT EVIDENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 406
FORCE OF HABIT? CONSIDERING THE RELEVANCE OF POST-INCIDENT EVIDENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 406
Marc D. Ginsberg, Hugh M. Mundy,
habitevidenceFRE 406freely admissibleroutine practicepost-incident conductpre-incident habitadmissibilitysemi-automaticrepetition
Articles in Vol. 86, Issue 1, 2022
Vol. 86, Issue 1, 2022
- LEGAL FICTION: READING LOLITA AS A SENTENCING MEMORANDUMChristina M. Frohock
- LACING A NEW SHOE: BALANCING DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS AGAINST THE RIGHT TO CONVENIENT REDRESSThomas McCarthy
- ABANDONING ORIGINAL MEANINGMichael L. Smith
- FORCE OF HABIT? CONSIDERING THE RELEVANCE OF POST-INCIDENT EVIDENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 406Marc D. GinsbergHugh M. Mundy
- FIGHTING IMAGE PIRACY OR COPYRIGHT TROLLING? AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF PHOTOGRAPHY COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT LAWSUITSMelissa Eckhause
Marc D. Ginsberg & Hugh M. Mundy, FORCE OF HABIT? CONSIDERING THE RELEVANCE OF POST-INCIDENT EVIDENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 406, 86 Albany Law Review 1 (2023).