P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
Vol. 88, Issue 3, 2025December 31, 2025 EDT
STATE COURT RESPONSES TO THE SUPREME COURT’S FLAWED CALIFORNIA V. HODARI D. DECISION
STATE COURT RESPONSES TO THE SUPREME COURT’S FLAWED CALIFORNIA V. HODARI D. DECISION
Matthew Montag,
Articles in Vol. 88, Issue 3, 2025
Vol. 88, Issue 3, 2025
- FIFTEENTH ANNUAL CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE H. COOKE SYMPOSIUM: CRIMINAL JUSTICE ON TRIAL: FAILINGS, POSSIBILITIES, AND ASPIRATIONSAlbany Law Review
- AMERICA’S FORGOTTEN HISTORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL CRISISMarcus Gadson
- STATE LEGISLATURES AND THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE: COUNTERMAJORITARIAN ABORTION LEGISLATION POST-DOBBSChelsea H. Blake
- THE LIMITS OF INNOCENCE: FREESTANDING ACTUAL INNOCENCE CLAIMS IN NEW YORK’S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMRachael Brown
- STATE COURT RESPONSES TO THE SUPREME COURT’S FLAWED CALIFORNIA V. HODARI D. DECISIONMatthew Montag
Matthew Montag, STATE COURT RESPONSES TO THE SUPREME COURT’S FLAWED CALIFORNIA V. HODARI D. DECISION, 88 Albany Law Review 797 (2025).