This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Albany Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • Justice Commentaries
    • New York Appeals
    • State Constitutional Commentary
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Bylaws
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:20455/feed
P-ISSN 0002-4678
E-ISSN 2162-4151
New York Appeals
Vol. 87, Issue 2, 2024September 04, 2024 EDT

TEN YEARS LATER: FURTHER SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION BY APPELLATE COURTS IN APPLYING THE “DEVIATES MATERIALLY” STANDARD OF REVIEW

Richard J. Montes, Kathryn M. Beer, Alexis Sarnicola,
CPLR 5501(c)personal injury awardsdamagespain and suffering awardsbrain damage casesburn casesasbestosFirst DepartmentAppellate Division
Photo by Aidan Bartos on Unsplash
Albany Law Review
Richard J. Montes, Kathryn M. Beer & Alexis Sarnicola, TEN YEARS LATER: FURTHER SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION BY APPELLATE COURTS IN APPLYING THE “DEVIATES MATERIALLY” STANDARD OF REVIEW, 87 Albany Law Review 563 (2024).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system